Stella Sandford on why calls to diversify the curriculum sparked outrage in the papers

C. Thi Nguyen on what drives him up a wall

Stephen M. Gardiner on the “Pittsburgh, not Paris” smokescreen

David Papineau on what sport can tell us about deep philosophical questions

Kristie Miller on the paradox of time travel.

Kevin DeLapp and Jeremy Henkel on Augustine, Kant and FBI Director James Comey.

John M. Doris, Edouard Machery and Stephen Stich on why ethicists ought to listen

Matthew Meyer on a book that charts the rise of the American asshole.

Jennifer Saul on Trump’s surprisingly careful linguistic choices, and why they matter.

Véronique Munoz-Dardé on the meaning of sovereignty in the Brexit referendum debate.

Tamar Szabó Gendler asks, who’s to say?

Alfred Mele spins the neural roulette wheel behind our choices.

Dale Jacquette asks why cannabis and philosophy.

Alan Smith on the highs and lows of teaching philosophy in prison.

Mark Rowlands asks whether animals can be moral.

F. M. Kamm looks at some of the ways philosophers have argued about abortion that seem relevant to second trimester abortion in particular.

If feminist pornography were possible, what would it look like, asks A M Ferner.

Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay argue that philosophers must be scientifically informed.

Theron Pummer on doing good without harming others.

Peter Unger argues that fundamental claims in contemporary metaphysics, epistemology, and the philosophy of mind are just empty ideas.

In 2011, Howard Marks talked to Julian Baggini about prison, pot and Hempel's paradox.