Jennifer Saul on Trump’s surprisingly careful linguistic choices, and why they matter.

Véronique Munoz-Dardé on the meaning of sovereignty in the Brexit referendum debate.

Tamar Szabó Gendler asks, who’s to say?

Alfred Mele spins the neural roulette wheel behind our choices.

Dale Jacquette asks why cannabis and philosophy.

Alan Smith on the highs and lows of teaching philosophy in prison.

Mark Rowlands asks whether animals can be moral.

F. M. Kamm looks at some of the ways philosophers have argued about abortion that seem relevant to second trimester abortion in particular.

If feminist pornography were possible, what would it look like, asks A M Ferner.

Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay argue that philosophers must be scientifically informed.

Theron Pummer on doing good without harming others.

Peter Unger argues that fundamental claims in contemporary metaphysics, epistemology, and the philosophy of mind are just empty ideas.

In 2011, Howard Marks talked to Julian Baggini about prison, pot and Hempel's paradox.

Travis Timmerman argues against the assumption that our death is lamentable only if it is bad for us.

In 2001, Julian Baggini interviewed Hilary Putnam (1926-2016), the philosopher who never stood still

Rodger Jackson on the essence of the student/teacher dynamic.

Peter Boghossian argues that we should spotlight and build upon the efforts of philosophers who are doing work that matters.

Phil Hutchinson and Rupert Read consider the public policy of sex.

Berit Brogaard on parenting, autonomy and life-satisfaction.

Jenny Judge argues it's time music was rescued from the sidelines of philosophical inquiry.

John Corvino on the emergence and future of LGBTQ philosophy as applied philosophy.