Jeff Mason argues that the concept of death has no subjective meaning.

Michael Ezra argues that Karl Marx's anti-Semitism is clear and unambiguous.

Jeremy Stangroom on Michel Foucault's political naiveté.

Richard J. Bernstein argues that she is worth reading, and rereading, in these dark times

Kerrie Grain argues that the time for Héloïse to be recognised as love's true philosopher is long overdue.

Rupert Read on Richard Rorty's warning to the future.

 TPM's brief introduction to the ideas and work of Mary Wollstonecraft.

Massimo Pigliucci on the metaphysical implications of an approach to physics that suggests time and space are not entities, but rather ways to order events.

Stephen Mumford outlines a new cogito argument that proves the existence of something that exists independently of us.

Jeremy Stangroom on a tricky issue of consent.

Jennifer Saul on the psychological biases adversely affecting philosophy – and what we can do about it.

Rupert Read argues that the choice is clear in this election.

In an article originally published in June 2012, Jeff Mason reflects on his cancer diagnosis and impending death.

Massimo Pigliucci argues against the simplicities of nature versus nurture as they are manifest in debates over gender and race.

Rupert Read argues that we need to be less fixated on the evidence, where the human world is concerned, and more determined to take up a precautionary stance.

Russell Blackford takes issue with the substance and style of Massimo Pigliucci's defense of accommodationism.

David Benatar argues that violence against men and boys is a human rights issue worthy of consideration in campaigns against violence.

Adam Ferner reviews a pared-down stage adaptation of Camus' novel

Peter Monnerjahn argues that "absolute truth" is a notion we have no need for and should discard.

Kathryn Norlock reviews Kate Manne's book on the nature of misogyny

Massimo Pigliucci argues against oversimplification in the way we view Islam and the way we view criticism of Islam.

Russell Blackford argues that it’s not our job to punish individuals, make examples of them, or suppress their views.

Massimo Pigliucci rejects the easy dichotomies that characterise so much of the debate over trigger warnings.

Russell Blackford on why we must defend the free speech of speakers we oppose.