It’s what Pam R Sailors thinks about, when she thinks about running.

Kevin DeLapp and Jeremy Henkel on Augustine, Kant and FBI Director James Comey.

Nicholas G. Evans thinks through the tangle of rights and wrongs

Peter Worley argues that philosophy in the classroom depends on a skilled facilitator.

G. Fay Edwards examines some bizarre ancient arguments against eating our fellow creatures

By Anil Gomes

Julian Baggini looks beyond traditional approaches to the free will debate.

Alexandra Bradner and Andrew P. Mills argue that teaching is a lot more than just telling

Rupert Read introduces the work and ideas of Ludwig Wittgenstein.

Mary Midgley on mistakes in our thinking about evolution, function, and self.

Quassim Cassam looks at the conduct of our politicians through the lens of vice epistemology, and asks how useful an understanding of epistemic vices is as a tool of political analysis?

Stella Sandford on why calls to diversify the curriculum sparked outrage in the papers

Barry C. Smith argues for a collaborative approach

Quassim Cassam makes a case for a new, human picture of self-knowledge.

Stephen Mumford argues that sport's importance lies in the connections between embodiment, power and freedom.

Margaret Betz reviews Camus' classic.

Helen de Cruz talks to Philosophy PhDs outside the academy who most definitely are not “slumming it”.

Julian Baggini reviews Kathleen Stock's controversial new book.

James Ladyman argues that philosophy's inaccessibility is actually a good thing.

Carlos Alberto Sánchez scouts the habitat of Emilio Uranga’s thinking

Jennifer M Morton argues that a philosophical education needs to enable students to conceive of a better way for things to be.