It’s what Pam R Sailors thinks about, when she thinks about running.

Stella Sandford on why calls to diversify the curriculum sparked outrage in the papers

G. Fay Edwards examines some bizarre ancient arguments against eating our fellow creatures

By Anil Gomes

On the fiftieth anniversary of Gettier’s famous paper, Fred Dretske explains what we should have learned from it.

Julian Baggini looks beyond traditional approaches to the free will debate.

Mary Midgley on mistakes in our thinking about evolution, function, and self.

Barry C. Smith argues for a collaborative approach

Alexandra Bradner and Andrew P. Mills argue that teaching is a lot more than just telling

Quassim Cassam makes a case for a new, human picture of self-knowledge.

Stephen Mumford argues that sport's importance lies in the connections between embodiment, power and freedom.

Quassim Cassam looks at the conduct of our politicians through the lens of vice epistemology, and asks how useful an understanding of epistemic vices is as a tool of political analysis?

James Ladyman argues that philosophy's inaccessibility is actually a good thing.

Darian Meacham tackles a difficult question

Jennifer M Morton argues that a philosophical education needs to enable students to conceive of a better way for things to be.

David Edmonds on a newspaper column that is a testament to the breadth of philosophical ideas and their relevance to how we lead our lives.

If feminist pornography were possible, what would it look like, asks A M Ferner.

Russell Blackford looks at the conceptual foundations of a new intellectual movement.

Tamar Szabó Gendler asks, who’s to say?

Carlos Alberto Sánchez scouts the habitat of Emilio Uranga’s thinking

Constantine Sandis and Nassim N Taleb on how to think about risk, harm and having skin in the game.