Ian M. Church on intellectual humility and the "loyalty" of Trump's supporters.
Russell Blackford argues that it’s not our job to punish individuals, make examples of them, or suppress their views.
Russell Blackford takes issue with the substance and style of Massimo Pigliucci's defense of accommodationism.
David Benatar argues that violence against men and boys is a human rights issue worthy of consideration in campaigns against violence.
Jeremy Stangroom on Michel Foucault's political naiveté.
Russell Blackford on why we must defend the free speech of speakers we oppose.
Russell Blackford examines some of the arguments offered against assisted suicide.
Massimo Pigliucci argues against the simplicities of nature versus nurture as they are manifest in debates over gender and race.
Massimo Pigliucci argues against oversimplification in the way we view Islam and the way we view criticism of Islam.
Kerrie Grain argues that the time for Héloïse to be recognised as love's true philosopher is long overdue.
Jeremy Stangroom asks whether it is possible to construct a convincing moral case against a (particular) decision to commit suicide.
Rupert Read argues that we need to be less fixated on the evidence, where the human world is concerned, and more determined to take up a precautionary stance.
Stephen Mumford outlines a new cogito argument that proves the existence of something that exists independently of us.
Duncan Pritchard and S. Orestis Palermos argue that it isn't obvious why being smart is associated with holding lots of information in your head.
Massimo Pigliucci rejects the easy dichotomies that characterise so much of the debate over trigger warnings.
Kerrie Grain asks whether Héloïse d'Argenteuil can properly be said to have had an Héloïse complex.
Stephen Mumford considers whether the presence of mental illness undermines the capacity to act freely.
Russell Blackford examines the controversy generated by PEN America's decision to give Charlie Hebdo its free expression award.
TPM's brief introduction to the ideas and work of Mary Wollstonecraft.
Massimo Pigliucci on the metaphysical implications of an approach to physics that suggests time and space are not entities, but rather ways to order events.
Peter Monnerjahn argues that "absolute truth" is a notion we have no need for and should discard.
Michael Ezra argues that Karl Marx's anti-Semitism is clear and unambiguous
Benjamin Nelson on philosophical rabbits and their quest to understand the character of moral claims.
Jeremy Stangroom on a tricky issue of consent.
Ian M. Church on intellectual humility and the "loyalty" of Trump's supporters.
Russell Blackford argues that it’s not our job to punish individuals, make examples of them, or suppress their views.
Russell Blackford takes issue with the substance and style of Massimo Pigliucci's defense of accommodationism.
David Benatar argues that violence against men and boys is a human rights issue worthy of consideration in campaigns against violence.
Jeremy Stangroom on Michel Foucault's political naiveté.
Russell Blackford on why we must defend the free speech of speakers we oppose.
Russell Blackford examines some of the arguments offered against assisted suicide.
Massimo Pigliucci argues against the simplicities of nature versus nurture as they are manifest in debates over gender and race.
Massimo Pigliucci argues against oversimplification in the way we view Islam and the way we view criticism of Islam.
Kerrie Grain argues that the time for Héloïse to be recognised as love's true philosopher is long overdue.
Jeremy Stangroom asks whether it is possible to construct a convincing moral case against a (particular) decision to commit suicide.
Rupert Read argues that we need to be less fixated on the evidence, where the human world is concerned, and more determined to take up a precautionary stance.
Stephen Mumford outlines a new cogito argument that proves the existence of something that exists independently of us.
Duncan Pritchard and S. Orestis Palermos argue that it isn't obvious why being smart is associated with holding lots of information in your head.
Massimo Pigliucci rejects the easy dichotomies that characterise so much of the debate over trigger warnings.
Kerrie Grain asks whether Héloïse d'Argenteuil can properly be said to have had an Héloïse complex.
Stephen Mumford considers whether the presence of mental illness undermines the capacity to act freely.
Russell Blackford examines the controversy generated by PEN America's decision to give Charlie Hebdo its free expression award.
TPM's brief introduction to the ideas and work of Mary Wollstonecraft.
Massimo Pigliucci on the metaphysical implications of an approach to physics that suggests time and space are not entities, but rather ways to order events.
Peter Monnerjahn argues that "absolute truth" is a notion we have no need for and should discard.
Michael Ezra argues that Karl Marx's anti-Semitism is clear and unambiguous
Benjamin Nelson on philosophical rabbits and their quest to understand the character of moral claims.
Jeremy Stangroom on a tricky issue of consent.
The Philosophers’ Magazine is an independent quarterly, founded by Julian Baggini and Jeremy Stangroom in 1997. We’re devoted to publishing philosophy that’s clear, enlightening, and thought-provoking.
Copyright © 2017 The Philosophers' Magazine Unless specified, images courtesy of FORTEPAN