Massimo Pigliucci rejects the easy dichotomies that characterise so much of the debate over trigger warnings.
Russell Blackford looks at how the human cloning debate has played out over the last 20 years.
Russell Blackford on why we must defend the free speech of speakers we oppose.
Reviewed by Erich Hatala Matthes
Russell Blackford examines some of the arguments offered against assisted suicide.
Ian M. Church on intellectual humility and the "loyalty" of Trump's supporters.
Martin O'Neill and Liam Shields on Labour and state education
Julian Friedland shows how the pandemic might inspire a more virtuous economy.
Stephen Mumford considers whether the presence of mental illness undermines the capacity to act freely.
Simon Hewitt takes a philosophical approach to political engagement.
Reviewed by Katharine Jenkins
Jeremy Stangroom reflects on some of the problems of thinking that absence of privilege necessarily confers certain epistemological advantages.
Benjamin Nelson on philosophical rabbits and their quest to understand the character of moral claims.
Fabienne Peter asks whether a strong political leader is a good thing.
Claire Creffield on how religion continues to give us a rich mythology of our quest to apprehend the real.
Duncan Pritchard and S. Orestis Palermos argue that it isn't obvious why being smart is associated with holding lots of information in your head.
Russell Blackford reviews Mitchell Stephens' compelling and pleasing account of the origin and rise of atheism.
Alexander X. Douglas asks why we're taken in by meaningless catchphrases.
Kerrie Grain asks whether Héloïse d'Argenteuil can properly be said to have had an Héloïse complex.
Russell Blackford examines the controversy generated by PEN America's decision to give Charlie Hebdo its free expression award.
Lorna Finlayson on what makes this election different.
Lorna Finlayson analyses Paxman's interview technique.
Jennifer Hornsby on the UK and French elections.
Jennifer Saul on how Theresa May is getting away with it.
Massimo Pigliucci rejects the easy dichotomies that characterise so much of the debate over trigger warnings.
Russell Blackford looks at how the human cloning debate has played out over the last 20 years.
Russell Blackford on why we must defend the free speech of speakers we oppose.
Reviewed by Erich Hatala Matthes
Russell Blackford examines some of the arguments offered against assisted suicide.
Ian M. Church on intellectual humility and the "loyalty" of Trump's supporters.
Martin O'Neill and Liam Shields on Labour and state education
Julian Friedland shows how the pandemic might inspire a more virtuous economy.
Stephen Mumford considers whether the presence of mental illness undermines the capacity to act freely.
Simon Hewitt takes a philosophical approach to political engagement.
Reviewed by Katharine Jenkins
Jeremy Stangroom reflects on some of the problems of thinking that absence of privilege necessarily confers certain epistemological advantages.
Benjamin Nelson on philosophical rabbits and their quest to understand the character of moral claims.
Fabienne Peter asks whether a strong political leader is a good thing.
Claire Creffield on how religion continues to give us a rich mythology of our quest to apprehend the real.
Duncan Pritchard and S. Orestis Palermos argue that it isn't obvious why being smart is associated with holding lots of information in your head.
Russell Blackford reviews Mitchell Stephens' compelling and pleasing account of the origin and rise of atheism.
Alexander X. Douglas asks why we're taken in by meaningless catchphrases.
Kerrie Grain asks whether Héloïse d'Argenteuil can properly be said to have had an Héloïse complex.
Russell Blackford examines the controversy generated by PEN America's decision to give Charlie Hebdo its free expression award.
Lorna Finlayson on what makes this election different.
Lorna Finlayson analyses Paxman's interview technique.
Jennifer Hornsby on the UK and French elections.
Jennifer Saul on how Theresa May is getting away with it.
The Philosophers’ Magazine is an independent quarterly, founded by Julian Baggini and Jeremy Stangroom in 1997. We’re devoted to publishing philosophy that’s clear, enlightening, and thought-provoking.
Copyright © 2017 The Philosophers' Magazine Unless specified, images courtesy of FORTEPAN